EAF vs securities broker (agencia de valores): which license your project needs

The decision is not about capital, it is about services: if you only issue personalized recommendations, an EAF is enough; if you also handle orders, place products or want to grow through agents, your license type is the securities broker (agencia de valores). We help you decide with your business plan in front of us.

Torn between an EAF and a securities broker? Free assessment

Tell us what you will do with each client and we will tell you which license type fits, how much capital it requires and what structure you will have to maintain.

  • 50+ firms advised
  • Reply within 24 h
  • No commitment
EAF capital
€75,000
Securities broker capital
€150,000
CNMV maximum timeframe
Up to 6 months
Key regulation
Law 6/2023

Four projects, two distinct licenses

The same question comes from very different profiles. Look at the verb that defines each business: recommend, process orders, place or distribute.

Wealth advisor

Only recommends: EAF

“My client decides and executes at their bank; I provide the recommendation and the follow-up. I don’t need to touch the order, so paying for the structure of a securities broker would be throwing capital away.”

Fund distributor

Places products: securities broker

“I work with several fund managers and get paid for placing their funds with qualified investors. That is placing, not advice: my license has to be a securities broker license.”

Digital platform

Handles orders: the app needs RTO

“We want users to receive the proposal and confirm the transaction inside the app. As soon as we transmit that order to the broker, we are outside the EAF perimeter.”

Sales network

Grows through agents: the EAF falls short

“My client acquisition plan relies on a network of agents across the country. Since an EAF generally cannot appoint them, the license type that allows it is the securities broker.”

Three ways to get your license choice wrong

Applying for the wrong license type costs you twice: in capital and structure if your license is more than you need, and in sanction risk if it falls short. These are the mistakes we see most often.

Deciding on price: staying with an EAF because it requires less capital when your actual operations include handling orders puts you outside your license, and providing reserved investment services without authorization is a very serious infringement.

Oversizing “just in case”: applying for a securities broker license when you don’t need it doubles the initial capital, tightens the prudential regime and multiplies the resources you will have to demonstrate and maintain year after year.

Forgetting the sales channel: if your growth depends on a network of tied agents, the EAF is not your license type: as a general rule it cannot appoint them, and discovering this once the license is granted forces you to rebuild your strategy.

EAF, securities broker and broker-dealer: what each license allows and how much capital it requires
License type Initial capital Services allowed
EAF €75,000 Investment advice. Does not handle orders or place products and, as a general rule, does not appoint tied agents.
Securities broker (agencia de valores) €150,000 In addition to advice: reception and transmission of orders, execution and placing, always on behalf of clients. Can appoint tied agents.
Broker-dealer (sociedad de valores) €750,000 The full range of investment services, including dealing on own account. The most structurally demanding license type.

Choose your license type with data, not intuition

We review each client’s actual flow with you—who recommends, who places the order, who gets paid what—and translate it into the right license: EAF, securities broker or its simplified version. Then we prepare the application so the CNMV can approve it without surprises.

EAF vs securities broker: frequently asked questions

What is the real difference between an EAF and a securities broker?

The scope of services. An EAF is licensed for a single investment service: investment advice, that is, recommending specific instruments to specific clients. A securities broker can, in addition to advising, receive and transmit orders (RTO), execute them on behalf of clients and take part in placing instruments.

Everything else hangs on that scope: initial capital (€75,000 vs €150,000), structure, technical resources and the ability to appoint tied agents.

Can an EAF take the client’s order and pass it on to their bank or broker?

As a general rule, no. Reception and transmission of orders is an investment service separate from advice and falls outside the EAF license: the client receives the recommendation and executes it themselves with their own institution.

If someone on your team channels the order to the intermediary, you are providing RTO without authorization to do so, and carrying out reserved investment services without authorization is a very serious infringement. In that scenario, the license type to consider is the securities broker.

What exactly do RTO and placing include?

Reception and transmission of orders consists of taking the client’s instruction and passing it on to whoever executes it (a broker, a fund manager, a market). Execution goes one step further: completing the transaction on the client’s behalf. And placing means distributing an issuer’s or a fund manager’s instruments among investors, usually in exchange for a commission.

All three are services reserved to entities authorized to provide them. If your model includes any of them, an EAF is not enough: you need a securities broker or, depending on the scope, another investment firm (ESI).

Who can appoint tied agents?

Broker-dealers and securities brokers can rely on tied agents to attract clients and promote their services; EAFs, as a general rule, cannot appoint them.

It is a decisive difference if your sales plan relies on an external network: the agent acts on behalf of the firm, is entered in the relevant register and remains under the firm’s responsibility and supervision. You will find the details in tied agents and agent registers.

What initial capital does each license type require?

Under the prudential regime for investment firms (IFR/IFD), the indicative initial capital is:

  • EAF: €75,000.
  • Securities broker: €150,000.
  • Broker-dealer: €750,000.

Initial capital is only the entry ticket: the firm must then maintain permanent own funds linked, broadly speaking, to its fixed overheads, as well as the liquidity and governance requirements that apply to it. We cover this in regulatory capital and the IFR/IFD regime.

What is a “simplified” securities broker?

It is not a separate legal category, but a securities broker with a limited program of activities: for example, RTO and advice without holding client money or instruments. With fewer services, the resources, controls and structure you must demonstrate are generally lighter.

It is an attractive route for light intermediation models that do not want to take on the infrastructure of a full-service broker. We explain it in simplified securities broker.

Can I start as an EAF and apply for a securities broker license later?

Yes. Expanding into additional services is processed with the CNMV through the corresponding amendment or new authorization, as the case may be, with an application that demonstrates the capital, resources and controls for the new operations.

However, each change of license type takes time and fees: if your three-to-five-year plan already includes handling orders or placing products, it usually pays to size the license correctly from the start. It is the same logic we apply to the move from EAFN to EAF.

Does the authorization procedure differ between the two license types?

The framework is the same—Law 6/2023, Royal Decree 813/2023 and the investment firm (ESI) authorization procedure before the CNMV, with a general decision period of up to 6 months from the complete application—but the content is not: more services mean more resources, more controls and more questions from the supervisor.

A securities broker will have to demonstrate order-handling systems, best execution and, if it holds client assets, asset safeguarding; an EAF focuses its effort on the advisory process. That is why the first step is always to pin down the scope of services.

How to choose a license type you won’t regret in two years

Our method reduces the decision to three moves: map what you will actually do, put a price on each license and apply for the chosen one with a tailored application.

Move 1

Map your actual operations

Draw a client’s full journey: who recommends, who enters the order, who pays whom. Each verb in that flow points to a specific investment service, and the sum of services points to a license type.

Move 2

Put a price on each license

Compare initial capital, permanent own funds, minimum structure and annual compliance cost for an EAF and a securities broker. The license that is cheap to obtain may be expensive to maintain, and vice versa.

Move 3

Apply with a tailored application

Once you have chosen the license type, the program of activities must reflect exactly those operations: no extra services that force you to demonstrate unnecessary resources, and no missing services that leave you outside your license with your first client.

EAF vs securities broker decision checklist in 10 steps

  1. Service inventory: list what you will do with each client: only recommend, or also channel orders, execute or place third-party products?
  2. Order flow: identify who transmits each transaction to the broker or fund manager; if it is someone on your team, you are already in RTO territory.
  3. Revenue model: distinguish advisory fees from placing or brokerage commissions: each revenue stream presupposes an authorized service.
  4. Sales channel: decide whether you will grow through tied agents; a securities broker can appoint them and an EAF, as a general rule, cannot.
  5. Available capital: compare your resources with the €75,000 required for an EAF and the €150,000 required for a securities broker, plus the permanent own funds of each.
  6. Structure and resources: estimate the team, systems and controls each license type will require you to demonstrate: handling orders requires more infrastructure than recommending.
  7. 3–5 year plan: project the business: if execution or placing will come anyway, consider applying for a securities broker license from the start.
  8. Draft program of activities: write it and look for the verbs: “transmit,” “execute” or “place” rule out the EAF on their own.
  9. Prudential check: verify which IFR/IFD class will apply to you and the associated reporting before committing to a structure.
  10. Application and filing: prepare the documentation for the chosen license type and file an application with the CNMV that is consistent with all of the above.

Is it clear now? Start with EAF authorization or with the securities broker license; if your model is light intermediation, look at the simplified securities broker.

Free resource · PDF

Download the 10-step EAF Checklist

The 10 steps to set up your Financial Advisory Firm (EAF) with the CNMV, with the evidence you must be able to show at each one. Keep it at hand throughout the project.

  • The 10 steps, from idea to authorization
  • The evidence the CNMV expects at each step
  • License table: EAFN, EAF and securities broker
  • Professional PDF · 5 pages · 11 KB

No spam. Your email is only used to send you this checklist and, occasionally, relevant regulatory updates.

Your download has started

The checklist is downloading right now. If it does not start automatically, click here.

After reading it, do you need help implementing any of the steps? Write to us directly:

Operational glossary

Vocabulary for comparing an EAF and a securities broker

These are the terms that separate one license from another. Once you know which service each one is, choosing the license type almost takes care of itself.

RTOService

Reception and transmission of orders

Taking the client’s instruction and passing it on to whoever executes it. It is the service that most often takes a project outside the EAF perimeter.

Requires a securities broker or another authorized investment firm (ESI).
ExecutionService

Execution of orders on behalf of clients

Completing the transaction in the market on the client’s behalf. It requires systems, controls and a best execution policy that is genuinely applied.

Subject to MiFID II Art. 27 (best execution).
PlacingService

Distribution of instruments

Distributing third-party issues or products among investors, usually for a commission paid by the issuer or fund manager. A reserved activity.

Common in fund distribution models.
Tied agentChannel

The external sales network

A natural or legal person that attracts clients and promotes services on behalf of an investment firm (ESI), under the firm’s responsibility and entered in a register.

EAFs, as a general rule, cannot appoint them.
EAFLicense type

The pure-advice license

An investment firm (ESI) limited to investment advice: personalized recommendations without touching the order or the product.

Initial capital: €75,000.
Securities brokerLicense type

Intermediation on behalf of clients

An investment firm (ESI) that advises and also handles and executes orders and places instruments on behalf of clients, without dealing on own account. It can appoint agents.

Initial capital: €150,000.
Broker-dealerLicense type

The top tier

An investment firm (ESI) with the full range of services, including dealing on own account. Much greater structure and requirements.

Initial capital: €750,000.
CustodyAncillary

Safeguarding of client assets

An ancillary service of safekeeping client money and instruments. Adding it to the program of activities significantly raises the controls required.

Forgoing custody simplifies the application.
Program of activitiesApplication

Where your scope is set

The application document that lists services, instruments and resources. What is not in it, you cannot provide; what is in it, you must be able to demonstrate.

It determines which license type you are actually applying for.
Decision playbook

Five criteria that separate one license type from another

Criterion
What you must validate
Where it is documented

Scope of services

If the client executes on their own after receiving your recommendation, you fit within an EAF; if your firm is involved in the order or in distribution, you need a securities broker.

Program of activities, client agreements and a description of the operational flow.

Revenue model

Advisory fees point to an EAF; placing or brokerage commissions presuppose services that only a securities broker can provide.

Fee schedule, cost disclosures and agreements with fund managers or issuers.

Growth channel

A network of tied agents requires a license type that can appoint them; with direct or digital client acquisition, an EAF remains an option.

Sales plan, agency agreements and entries in the agent registers.

Capital and prudential requirements

Ability to pay in and maintain €75,000 or €150,000, plus the permanent own funds, liquidity and reporting of the applicable IFR/IFD class.

Three-year financial plan, calculation of prudential requirements and evidence that the capital has been paid in.

Resources and controls

Each service adds infrastructure: order handling, best execution and, where applicable, asset safeguarding require systems that the supervisor will want to see described.

Organizational chart, operating procedures and description of systems in the application.

Signs that your project goes beyond an EAF

If you tick any of these boxes, review the license type before filing the application: you probably need a securities broker.

  • In your sales flow, someone on the team “passes the order” to the broker or fund manager on the client’s behalf.
  • Part of your revenue will come from issuers or fund managers for distributing or placing their products.
  • Your expansion relies on a network of agents who will operate under your brand.
  • You offer clients “execution” or “direct market access,” not just recommendations.
  • Your website or pitch talks about “trading” and “handling orders” when the planned license covers advice only.

Book a call

Tell us which services you want to provide and we will tell you whether your project fits within an EAF or requires a securities broker.

EAF and securities broker: two investment firm (ESI) licenses for different businesses

Law 6/2023 of March 17 and Royal Decree 813/2023 of November 8 organize Spanish investment firms (ESIs) into four types: broker-dealer (sociedad de valores), securities broker (agencia de valores), portfolio management company and financial advisory firm (EAF). When an advisory or intermediation project seeks a license, the question almost always comes down to two of them: the EAF, specialized in personalized recommendations, and the securities broker, which adds operations on behalf of clients. Getting the choice right determines the capital you tie up, the structure you maintain and the regulatory risk you take on.

What each license type can do

An EAF provides a single investment service: investment advice, understood as personalized recommendations on specific financial instruments. The client decides and executes on their own. A securities broker, by contrast, can also receive and transmit orders, execute them on behalf of clients and place instruments, always without dealing on own account (that territory belongs to the broker-dealer). The practical consequence: if your firm is involved in the transaction—even just by passing on the order—an EAF does not cover your activity.

Initial capital and prudential regime

Under the IFR/IFD prudential regime (Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 and Directive (EU) 2019/2034), the indicative initial capital is €75,000 for an EAF and €150,000 for a securities broker. From there, both must maintain permanent own funds linked, broadly speaking, to their fixed overheads, together with liquidity, governance and reporting requirements proportionate to their prudential class; EAFs usually fall into Class 3, for small and non-interconnected firms. The more services a firm provides, the heavier its prudential and organizational burden tends to be. We go into more detail in IFR/IFD and regulatory capital.

Tied agents: the channel that settles many decisions

In some projects, the choice is driven not by the service but by the channel. Broker-dealers and securities brokers can rely on tied agents—professionals who attract clients and promote services on behalf of the firm and are entered in the relevant registers—while EAFs, as a general rule, cannot appoint them. If your business plan rests on an external sales network, that fact alone rules out the EAF, however advice-driven your model may be.

How the application works and what happens if you choose wrong

Both license types follow the investment firm (ESI) authorization procedure before the CNMV, with a general decision period of up to 6 months from the date the application is complete; the difference lies in the content, because each additional service requires you to demonstrate more resources and controls. Choosing too narrow a license means operating outside your authorization—a very serious infringement under the reserved activity rules—and choosing too broad a one drives up capital and compliance costs with no return. If you start with advice, you will find the full route in how to set up an EAF; and if the business later needs more services, the change of license type is processed with the CNMV through an extension application, as we explain in relation to converting an EAFN into an EAF.

Law 6/2023 Royal Decree 813/2023 RTO Tied agent IFR/IFD MiFID II CNMV

Official sources

Key legislation, linked to the official text:

Legislation and links reviewed in .