What the token gives
We analyze the economic, voting, usage or redemption rights, using the white paper, the contracts and the code where necessary.
Before launching a token you need to know what it is legally. We analyze its rights under the MiCA Regulation and the ESMA guidelines, give you a reasoned report and, if it is a crypto-asset, prepare the MiCA Art. 8(4) explanation that accompanies the white paper.
Not sure whether your token is a security?
Tell us what rights your token gives and how you plan to sell it, and we will tell you whether you need a classification report and what it costs.
The classification of your token determines the rules that apply, the document you need, who supervises you and who can sell it.
We analyze the economic, voting, usage or redemption rights, using the white paper, the contracts and the code where necessary.
We apply the ESMA criteria for transferable securities, money market instruments, units in collective investment undertakings and derivatives.
We check whether the token aims to maintain a stable value by referencing an official currency or other assets.
We review the exclusions: unique NFTs, deposits, insurance and the other cases in Article 2 of MiCA.
We deliver a report with the classification, the reasoning and the practical consequences for your project.
If it is a crypto-asset, we draft the explanation that accompanies the white paper notification, using the ESAs template.
These are the situations in which we are most often asked for a classification report.
MiCA requires the notification to include an explanation of why the token is not a financial instrument, an asset-referenced token or an e-money token.
Banks, platforms and crypto-asset service providers increasingly ask for a legal analysis before working with a token.
Investors want to know whether the token is a security, because it changes their rights and their regulatory risk.
If the token gives usage rights and also a share in profits, ESMA says you must first look at whether it is a financial instrument.
Data from the MiCA Regulation, Law 6/2023 and the guidelines of ESMA and the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs).
MiCA does not apply to crypto-assets that are financial instruments: they are governed by securities law.
The authority does not approve the white paper before publication; it is notified to it.
The notification explains why the token is not excluded from MiCA, nor an e-money token, nor an asset-referenced token.
Minimum advance notice for notifying the white paper and the explanation before publishing them.
A token is classified by its rights and economic content, not by its name or its technology.
The competent authority for MiCA in Spain; the Bank of Spain supervises asset-referenced tokens and the issuers of e-money tokens.
Send us the white paper or a description of the token’s rights and we will tell you which rules apply and which document you need.
We analyze its economic content, not its name. Under the ESMA guidelines on classifying crypto-assets as financial instruments, a token is a transferable security if it is not a payment instrument, belongs to a class of securities and is negotiable on the capital market; giving rights equivalent to those of a share (dividends, voting) or of a bond (repayment of principal, interest) points in that direction.
It falls outside MiCA (Art. 2(4)) and is governed by securities law: Law 6/2023, MiFID and the Prospectus Regulation. If it is represented on a distributed ledger, it needs an ERIR. We explain this in tokenization lawyers.
It is the document that accompanies the white paper notification for a crypto-asset that is neither an asset-referenced token nor an e-money token. It must explain why the token is not excluded from MiCA, nor an e-money token, nor an asset-referenced token. The ESAs published a template and a standardized test, applicable from May 12, 2025.
At least 20 working days before publication (MiCA Art. 8(5)). The authority does not approve it beforehand (Art. 8(3)), but it can request changes or suspend the offer if it detects problems. In Spain, the authority is the CNMV. More in white paper.
Not always. ESMA warns that a so-called “utility” token can be a financial instrument if it reproduces rights typical of a security. The mere expectation that the price will rise is not enough to make it one, but a right to a share of the profits weighs heavily.
Unique, non-fungible NFTs are outside MiCA, unless they meet the criteria of a financial instrument. ESMA clarifies that uniqueness is assessed by the content of the token, not by its technical identifier, and that fractions of an NFT are not automatically considered unique.
It depends on the complexity of the token and the documentation available. After reviewing the white paper and the contracts, we give you a fixed quote that includes, if you need it, the Art. 8(4) explanation.
We follow the order proposed by ESMA and the ESAs: financial instrument first, then tokens and exclusions.
If it meets the criteria of a security or other instrument, that classification prevails.
If it is not, we check whether it is an e-money token or an asset-referenced token.
Unique NFTs and the other cases that fall outside MiCA.
Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (Arts. 2, 3 and 8), ESMA Guidelines of March 19, 2025 and ESAs joint guidelines JC 2024 28.
Terms from the MiCA Regulation, MiFID II and the ESMA guidelines.
A digital representation of a value or right that is transferred or stored using DLT or similar technology.
A class of securities negotiable on the capital market, such as shares and bonds.
A token that aims to maintain a stable value by referencing an official currency.
A token that aims to maintain a stable value by referencing other assets or a combination of them.
A token that gives access to a good or service of the issuer.
It combines functions; if it meets the criteria of a financial instrument, that nature prevails.
Rules and document: Law 6/2023 and MiFID; prospectus unless exempt; ERIR if on DLT.
Who supervises and sells: CNMV; investment firms.
Rules and document: MiCA, Title IV; issued only by credit institutions or electronic money institutions.
Who supervises and sells: Bank of Spain for the issuer.
Rules and document: MiCA, Title III; issuer authorization (or notification, if it is a credit institution) and legal opinion.
Who supervises and sells: Bank of Spain.
Rules and document: MiCA, Title II; white paper notified with the Art. 8(4) explanation.
Who supervises and sells: CNMV; crypto-asset service providers.
These are the ones we see most often in white papers and investor presentations.
Tell us what rights your token gives and how you plan to distribute it, and we will prepare a diagnosis and a tailored quote.
Updated November 4, 2026
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) does not apply to crypto-assets that are financial instruments (Art. 2(4)). That is why the first question for any project is whether the token is a financial instrument: if it is, it is governed by securities law, and if not, by MiCA.
On March 19, 2025, ESMA published its guidelines on the conditions and criteria for classifying crypto-assets as financial instruments. They rest on two principles: technological neutrality, because tokenization does not change the nature of the instrument, and substance over form. They cover transferable securities, money market instruments, collective investment, derivatives, utility tokens, NFTs and hybrid tokens.
Whoever offers a crypto-asset that is neither an asset-referenced token nor an e-money token notifies its white paper to the authority at least 20 working days before publishing it, with an explanation of why the token is not excluded from MiCA nor one of those tokens (Art. 8). The European Supervisory Authorities set the template and a standardized test in their joint guidelines, applicable from May 12, 2025.
If the token is a crypto-asset, continue with the white paper and, if you will distribute it, with the CASP license. If it is a stable token, see e-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens. If it is a security, see tokenization lawyers.