Withdrawal from an exchange to the bank
“We gather your purchase, custody and sale history so that the deposit from the exchange is documented and consistent with your profile.”
Has your bank sent you a request to prove the source of the funds coming from your cryptocurrencies? We explain why Law 10/2010 requires it, what documents to provide and how to respond properly and on time to avoid your account being blocked.
Is your bank asking where your funds come from? Free assessment
Tell us what you have been asked for and we will tell you what to provide and how to respond.
Six areas of work to prove the source of your crypto funds, prepare your response to the request and keep your account from being blocked.
We document where your money comes from (purchases, trading, staking, salary paid in crypto) with the narrative and supporting evidence the bank requires under Law 10/2010.
We structure the cover letter and attachments so that your response is clear, complete and proportionate, anticipating what the bank will review.
On-chain analysis that reconstructs the path of your funds from their source to the exchange and the bank, with verifiable documentation.
We help you provide the originator and beneficiary data required by the Travel Rule, making the transaction more consistent in the eyes of the bank.
Using providers authorized under MiCA gives you higher-quality documentation and strengthens your narrative of lawful origin.
We respond to requests from the bank, the Spanish Tax Agency (Hacienda) or supervisors with organized, consistent documentation that is proportionate to the transaction.
Investors, digital nomads, companies paid in crypto and traders: each profile needs different source-of-funds evidence to respond properly.
“We gather your purchase, custody and sale history so that the deposit from the exchange is documented and consistent with your profile.”
“We document your invoicing, tax residence and traceability so you can respond when the bank asks you to justify income received in crypto-assets.”
“We prepare the accounting, contractual and traceability support so that your response to the bank is solid and conversion into euros is not held up.”
“When the bank asks for explanations about large movements, we organize the narrative and the evidence that support your trading.”
A source-of-funds request is your chance to avoid a block. If the response is late, incomplete or inconsistent, the bank may escalate its measures.
Account activity blocked: if you do not provide the source of the funds in time, the bank may restrict or block the account as a precaution.
Inconsistent response: contradictory documents or gaps raise more questions and drag the process out.
Report to SEPBLAC: if the bank cannot verify that the funds are lawful, it may report the transaction as suspicious.
The bank must know the source of the funds and the purpose of the transaction; if it cannot, it must refrain from executing it.
Failing to respond can lead to the relationship being terminated and make it harder to open an account at another bank.
What you tell the bank must be consistent with your personal income tax (IRPF) return and, where applicable, with Form 721 (Modelo 721) for crypto.
We help you gather the documents, prepare the traceability report and draft a clear, proportionate response to avoid a block.
Because the bank is an obliged entity under anti-money laundering rules and must know where the money comes from and the purpose of the transactions. Law 10/2010 requires it to apply due diligence measures, and deposits from exchanges often trigger that check.
Yes. Anti-money laundering rules require banks to collect this information and customers to cooperate with compliance. Refusing to provide it usually leads to a block or to the end of the relationship.
It depends on the source, but the usual documents are:
The bank sets the deadline in the request itself. You should respond within the deadline and back up your answer with documents: failing to respond is one of the most common reasons for a block.
The bank may apply restrictive measures and, if it cannot apply due diligence, refrain from executing the transaction and even close the account. In some cases it will report it to SEPBLAC.
Clear, complete, consistent and proportionate: a chronological narrative of where the money came from, backed by verifiable evidence. That is what resolves the request before it escalates to a block.
Because it reconstructs the path of the crypto-assets (on-chain and off-chain) from their source to the bank, with verifiable documentation. It is the strongest evidence that the funds have a lawful origin.
Yes. The information you give the bank must be consistent with your IRPF return (capital gains and losses) and, if you hold crypto in custody abroad, with Form 721. Consistency strengthens the case that the funds are lawful.
Responding to a source-of-funds request is not just sending an email: it means proving, in an organized and verifiable way, where the money comes from. The key is a narrative consistent with your profile, backed by evidence.
The bank is an obliged entity and must know the source of the funds and the purpose of the transaction. It is not distrust: it is a legal due diligence obligation that the bank must meet and document.
Exchange history, proof of purchases and sales, on-chain traceability, contracts or invoices if you are paid in crypto, and the related tax support. All of it consistent with each other.
A clear, chronological and verifiable explanation of how the money was generated. Responding on time and proportionately is what keeps the request from ending in a block.
Need help preparing your response? See our page on proving the origin of your crypto or request a traceability report.
Responding properly to a request is a process, not a conversation. It means reconstructing the source of the funds, documenting on-chain traceability and giving the bank a consistent, proportionate dossier. This panel shows how it works in practice.
1) RequestWe analyze the request: which transaction it questions, which documents would resolve the doubt and the response deadline.
2) SourceExchange history, purchases and sales, staking or salary paid in crypto: the real source of the money, documented and consistent with your profile.
3) TraceabilityWe connect source, custody and withdrawal through blockchain analysis to show that the funds have followed a lawful, verifiable path.
4) ResponseWe present the dossier in an organized way, with a cover letter that explains the source and attachments that prove it. The goal: resolve the request before it escalates to a block.
Quick decisionProof of purchase/sale from the exchange + basic traceability of the withdrawal.
Contracts/invoices + full history + tax support + chronological narrative.
Detailed on-chain traceability report + enhanced dossier + liaison with the bank.
Where the money arriving from the exchange comes from and why it is lawful.
Proof of purchases/sales, exchange history and traceability report.
That the amount and frequency fit your declared activity and income.
Payslips, invoices, contracts and tax returns consistent with the transaction.
The route from the source to the deposit, with no jumps or gaps.
On-chain report linking wallets, exchange and bank account.
That gains have been declared and, where applicable, assets held abroad.
IRPF return with capital gains/losses and Form 721 where applicable.
That you respond on time, clearly, completely and proportionately.
Cover letter + organized attachments + record of the submission and its date.
Avoiding them speeds up resolution and reduces the risk of a block.
If your bank asks you to prove the source of funds of your crypto, these terms will appear in the request and in your response. Understanding them helps you provide exactly what is needed.
A formal request for documents to verify the source of the funds and the purpose of the transaction, with a response deadline.
The body of evidence showing where the money comes from and that its origin is lawful. It is the core of your response to the bank.
The duty to identify the customer, understand the purpose of the transaction and verify the source of the funds before executing it.
Additional measures for higher-risk transactions or customers, such as high volumes or recurring crypto income. It requires more documentation.
Analysis of the path of the crypto-assets from their source to the bank. It reconstructs and documents where the money comes from.
The Spanish authority that receives suspicious transaction reports. A poorly resolved request can end in a report to SEPBLAC.
The information the bank holds about your activity and income. When a transaction does not fit the profile, it triggers the request.
An information return on cryptocurrencies held in custody outside Spain. Filing it correctly strengthens your case before the bank that the funds are lawful.
The bank must refrain from executing transactions when it cannot apply due diligence or considers them suspicious, and inform SEPBLAC.
Tell us what the bank has asked you for and we will explain what documents to provide and how to prepare your response.
When a bank asks you to prove the source of funds coming from cryptocurrencies, it is acting as an obliged entity under anti-money laundering rules. The law behind this requirement is Law 10/2010 of April 28 on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. It requires institutions to apply due diligence measures on the source of funds and the purpose of transactions, and requires customers to cooperate with compliance.
The request is usually triggered when deposits do not match the customer’s usual profile, when transfers arrive from an exchange, or when the amounts or frequency are high. It is a preliminary step: responding properly keeps the situation from turning into a block on the account or the transaction.
To prove a lawful origin, gather the exchange history, proof of purchases and sales, an on-chain traceability report, contractual support if you are paid in crypto, and tax documents. A chronological narrative consistent with the customer profile is what makes the response solid.
The information provided to the bank must be consistent with your personal income tax (IRPF) return (capital gains and losses) and, where applicable, with Form 721 for crypto held abroad. In addition, the originator and beneficiary data linked to the Travel Rule strengthen the traceability and consistency of the transaction.
The bank sets a response deadline and must apply its measures with proportionality and transparency. If it cannot establish that the funds are lawful, under Law 10/2010 it may refrain from executing the transaction and report it to SEPBLAC. On the supervisory side, the Bank of Spain and the CNMV (under MiCA) supervise institutions and crypto-asset service providers.
Key legislation, linked to the official text:
Legislation and links reviewed in .