Following the money trail
“We trace the funds from the victim’s wallet to the receiving exchanges, the basis for the criminal complaint and for seeking a freeze.”
We prepare the forensic expert report your case needs: on-chain traceability of the transactions, identification of wallets and exchanges, chain of custody and ratification before the court under Article 335 of the Civil Procedure Act (LEC). Valid as evidence in fraud, divorce, inheritance and tax-request cases.
Need a crypto forensic report? Free assessment
Tell us about your case and we will tell you whether an expert report is viable and what it can prove.
Six workstreams to turn on-chain activity into solid evidence: analysis, traceability, chain of custody, valuation and defense of the report at trial.
We reconstruct the flow of funds between wallets, identify the receiving exchanges and document every hop with a reproducible, verifiable methodology.
We capture and seal the digital evidence (hashes, screenshots, exports) under a chain of custody so that the evidence is not open to challenge.
The expert defends the report in court, answers the opposing party and explains the methodology with technical rigor (LEC Art. 335 et seq.).
We link addresses to services and, where possible, to identifiable counterparties, drawing on Travel Rule and exchange data.
We quantify amounts at the relevant date (purchase, fraud, separation, death) using valuation sources and criteria that hold up in court.
We connect the expert report with the lawful or unlawful source of the funds and their entry into or exit from the banking system, which is useful in fraud cases and asset disputes.
A crypto forensic expert report serves as evidence in very different proceedings: criminal, family, inheritance or tax.
“We trace the funds from the victim’s wallet to the receiving exchanges, the basis for the criminal complaint and for seeking a freeze.”
“We locate and value undeclared crypto-assets in family proceedings for a fair division of community property.”
“We identify and value the deceased’s crypto-assets for the inventory, the partition and the taxation of the estate.”
“The expert report backs up the source and traceability of the funds in tax verification procedures and audits.”
Blockchain activity is public, but presenting it as evidence without a methodology or chain of custody leaves it easy to challenge. A rigorous expert report is what makes it stand up before the judge.
Evidence open to challenge: loose screenshots without a hash or chain of custody lose evidentiary value against the opposing party.
Weak attribution: a wallet is not a person; without an attribution methodology, the link will be disputed.
Disputed valuation: without a clear date and source, the amount of the loss or of the asset is easily rebutted.
An expert opinion requires objectivity and, where applicable, ratification and defense at the oral hearing.
In criminal cases, the expert report supports the deception, the transfer of assets and the trail of the funds.
The sooner the on-chain evidence and the exchange data are captured, the better the chances of identifying those involved and taking action.
We prepare the forensic expert report with on-chain traceability, chain of custody and ratification in court, ready for fraud, family, inheritance or tax-request cases.
It is a forensic expert report that analyzes on-chain activity (transactions, wallets, exchanges) using a technical methodology and presents it as evidence in proceedings. It includes traceability, chain of custody, valuation and, if required, ratification before the court.
Many more than fraud:
Yes. An expert opinion is a means of evidence provided for in Articles 335 et seq. of the Civil Procedure Act (LEC). Its weight depends on the methodological rigor, the chain of custody of the evidence and the expert being able to ratify and defend it at the hearing if the opposing party requests it.
Not always directly. An address is not the same as a person, but it can be attributed by following the trail to exchanges (which do know their customers), Travel Rule data and other indicators. Final identification usually requires a court order to the exchange.
No. The expert report does not recover funds by itself: it is the technical evidence that supports the criminal complaint, the claim and, where applicable, the freeze at the receiving exchange. Be wary of anyone promising guaranteed recovery; it is often a second fraud (recovery scam).
It depends on the volume of transactions and the number of hops to analyze. To start, we need the addresses or hashes of the transactions, the exchange statements and any evidence (emails, contracts, screenshots). The sooner it is captured, the better.
Yes. The same report that proves a fraud can be used to prove the source and traceability of your funds in response to a tax authority request, or as evidence in your defense. Traceability works both ways.
Traceability is the analysis of the path of the funds; the expert report is the complete expert document that incorporates that traceability, the chain of custody, the valuation and the expert’s signature so that it has evidentiary value in proceedings.
A good expert report is not about “looking at the blockchain”: it means capturing evidence with a chain of custody, tracing the funds methodically, attributing, valuing and being able to defend it before the judge. The key is rigor at every step.
Before analyzing, the evidence must be captured and sealed (hashes, exports, screenshots) with a chain of custody. If the evidence is not properly preserved, everything else becomes open to challenge.
The flow of funds is reconstructed hop by hop, identifying receiving services and exchanges with a reproducible methodology that any expert can verify.
The report is written to be understood by the court and is ratified at the hearing. An expert opinion that the expert cannot defend loses its evidentiary value.
Is your case already underway? See the traceability report or how to prove the source of your crypto.
The blockchain is public, but turning that data into evidence that holds up takes method: preserving the evidence, tracing, attributing, valuing and defending. This panel shows how it is done in practice.
1) EvidenceWe capture and seal digital evidence with hashes and a chain of custody so that the evidence stays intact and is as hard to challenge as possible.
2) TraceabilityWe reconstruct the path hop by hop, identifying receiving services and exchanges with a reproducible methodology.
3) AttributionWe link addresses to services and counterparties where possible, and value the amounts at the relevant dates of the case.
4) Expert opinionWe draft the expert opinion with methodology, conclusions and technical caveats, and defend it at the hearing under LEC Art. 335 et seq.
Quick decisionTraceability to exchanges + attribution + support for the criminal complaint and the freeze.
Locating and valuing crypto-assets for the property division or the estate inventory.
Traceability and source of funds as evidence in response to the request.
Capture and sealing of digital evidence with a chain of custody.
Hashes, exports, screenshots with date and integrity.
Reconstruction of the flow of funds up to the entry/exit points.
Transaction graph and identified receiving exchanges.
Linking addresses to services and, where possible, counterparties.
KYC/Travel Rule data and documented technical indicators.
Quantification of amounts at the relevant dates of the case.
Valuation sources and criteria that hold up in court.
Defense of the report at the hearing and response to the opposing party.
Signed expert report and the expert’s appearance in court (LEC Art. 335).
Avoiding these mistakes is what separates solid evidence from evidence open to challenge.
If you are going to submit a crypto forensic expert report as evidence, these terms come up in the report and in the courtroom. Understanding them helps you judge how solid the expert opinion is.
A record documenting how each piece of digital evidence was obtained, sealed and kept. Without it, the evidence is easy to challenge.
Public information recorded on the blockchain: transactions, amounts, addresses and timestamps.
The process of linking an address to a service or counterparty. A wallet is not, by itself, an identified person.
Governs expert opinions in civil proceedings: objectivity, submission and, where applicable, ratification at the hearing.
Criminalizes deception for profit that leads to a transfer of assets. The expert report backs up the trail of the funds.
A unique value that identifies a piece of data or a transaction. It makes it possible to prove the integrity of the evidence and to reference transactions.
The obligation for providers to attach originator and beneficiary data, useful for attributing counterparties.
A platform with KYC where funds often end up. It is the point where a court order can reveal the account holder.
Calculating the value of the crypto-assets at the relevant date (fraud, separation, death) using a defensible source.
Tell us about your case and the evidence you have, and we will tell you whether an expert report is viable and what it could prove.
A crypto forensic expert report is a forensic expert opinion that analyzes the activity recorded on the blockchain and turns it into evidence in judicial or administrative proceedings. “Looking at the blockchain” is not enough: the value of the expert opinion depends on methodological rigor, on the chain of custody of the evidence and on the expert being able to ratify and defend it.
In civil matters, expert opinions are governed by Articles 335 et seq. of the Civil Procedure Act (Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil), which require the expert to be objective and provide for the expert to take part in the hearing to explain and defend the report. In criminal matters, the expert report serves to support elements of the crime of fraud (Articles 248 et seq. of the Criminal Code), such as the deception, the transfer of assets and, above all, the trail of the funds.
The technical core is on-chain traceability: reconstructing the path of the funds between wallets until the entry and exit points are identified, usually exchanges with customer identification (KYC) obligations. Attribution—linking an address to a person—is rarely direct and usually requires a court order to the receiving exchange, supported by Travel Rule data.
Crypto forensic reports are not only used in fraud cases. They are common evidence in divorces (crypto-assets hidden in the division of community property), inheritances (inventory and valuation of the estate) and Spanish Tax Agency requests, where traceability serves to prove the source and consistency of the funds.
To be clear: the expert report does not recover the money by itself and does not guarantee an outcome. It is the technical basis that supports the criminal complaint, the claim or the freeze at the exchange. Be wary of anyone promising guaranteed recovery: it is often a second fraud known as a recovery scam.