Risk assessment and manual
"It checks that the risk assessment is up to date and that the AML/CFT manual, which must be available to it, reflects the internal control measures actually in place."
We help you anticipate and respond to a SEPBLAC inspection: handling requests for information, reviewing your manual and internal controls, managing the case file and protecting you against the penalty regime of Law 10/2010, with your documentation ready and the right strategy.
Free consultation
We reply within 24 h
Six building blocks to prepare for, handle and close a SEPBLAC inspection, from a preventive review of your system to responding to requests for information and managing the penalty regime.
We review your AML/CFT system the way SEPBLAC would and detect gaps before the supervisor does: risk assessment, manual, customer files and reporting.
We help you answer SEPBLAC requests for information on time and in the proper form, preparing the documentation required and the strongest possible response.
We update your AML/CFT manual and internal control measures so that they are available to SEPBLAC and withstand its review.
We strengthen the role of the SEPBLAC representative and the internal control body, both key to dealing with the supervisor during the inspection.
We analyze the scope of potential infringements and build the defense in sanctioning proceedings, including how the penalty is graded and any mitigating factors.
We implement the corrective measures required by SEPBLAC after the inspection and bring your AML/CFT system up to date.
The supervisor does not just look at the paperwork: it checks that your AML/CFT system actually works, from the risk assessment and the manual to transaction reporting and training.
"It checks that the risk assessment is up to date and that the AML/CFT manual, which must be available to it, reflects the internal control measures actually in place."
"It checks customer files: identification, beneficial ownership and the application of standard and enhanced measures according to risk."
"It verifies suspicious transaction reports and systematic reporting: whether transactions were given a special examination and whether they were reported to SEPBLAC when required."
"It examines the internal control body, the SEPBLAC representative, the training plan and the annual external review."
An inspection can lead to recommendations, requirements to take corrective measures or sanctioning proceedings. Obstructing the inspection and serious breaches can result in very high fines.
The most common mistake: having a flawless manual that is not applied. SEPBLAC compares the paperwork with actual day-to-day operations, and the gap between the two is what gets penalized.
Cooperating is not optional: you must provide the documentation requested. Resisting or obstructing the inspection, once a formal request has been made, is a very serious infringement.
Penalties reach managers: in addition to the entity, liability can extend to directors and senior managers, with fines and disqualification.
For very serious infringements, the fine can reach the highest of several limits, up to €10 million.
Penalties can include a public reprimand, with reputational impact for the entity.
For entities that require authorization to operate, the penalty can extend to revocation of the authorization.
Whether you want to prepare preventively or already have a request on your desk, it pays to review your system, organize the documentation and plan your response carefully before the case moves forward.
SEPBLAC (Executive Service of the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Monetary Offenses) is Spain’s financial intelligence unit and its AML/CFT supervisor. Under Article 47 of Law 10/2010, it supervises and inspects compliance with the obligations of obliged entities.
It can be carried out remotely, through requests for documents and information, or through on-site visits. SEPBLAC analyzes your AML/CFT system, makes recommendations and can propose requirements to take corrective measures.
Anything relevant to assess compliance, for example:
Yes. Obliged entities must provide the documentation and information that SEPBLAC requests from them. Resisting or obstructing the inspection, where there is an express written request, is a very serious infringement.
Depending on the outcome, SEPBLAC can issue recommendations, propose to the Standing Committee requirements to take corrective measures or, in the event of significant breaches, open the way to sanctioning proceedings.
Law 10/2010 classifies infringements as minor, serious and very serious (Articles 50–53), depending on the obligation breached and how serious the breach is.
Fines (which, for very serious infringements, can reach the highest of several limits, up to €10 million), private or public reprimand and, for authorized entities, possible revocation of the authorization, in addition to the liability of directors and senior managers.
By keeping your system alive: an up-to-date risk assessment, a manual that is genuinely applied, organized files, reporting up to date, documented training and an external review. A mock inspection helps you detect gaps in time.
Not as a general rule. The AML/CFT manual is not submitted, but it must be kept up to date and available to SEPBLAC for the exercise of its supervisory and inspection functions.
The inspection usually begins with a request for information that specifies the documentation to be provided and the deadline. It is best to have your system ready at all times, because the first contact is already part of the supervisory action.
SEPBLAC investigates, and the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Monetary Offenses processes the case and makes a proposal; the penalty is imposed by the competent bodies of the Ministry or, in the most serious cases, by the Council of Ministers, depending on the seriousness of the infringement.
Yes. Law 10/2010 provides for the liability of directors and senior managers (Article 54), who can be penalized in addition to the entity, with fines and even disqualification in the most serious cases.
Law 10/2010 regulates the limitation periods for infringements and penalties (Article 60), with different periods depending on their seriousness. How the periods are calculated and interrupted is key to the defense in sanctioning proceedings.
Not necessarily. Publication of a public reprimand can be delayed or handled differently where it could harm an ongoing investigation or endanger the stability of financial markets.
The outcome of an inspection depends on how serious the breach is. We help you assess its scope and build the best strategy in each scenario.
The effort depends on when you act: preparing preventively is not the same as responding to a request for information or defending yourself in sanctioning proceedings.
We start from a realistic diagnosis of your system, organize the documentation and plan the response or the defense with the strongest strategy at each stage.
| Infringement | Minor | Serious | Very serious |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it covers | Less significant breaches | Breaches of significant obligations | Obstruction, deliberate failure to report, etc. |
| Fine (indicative) | Up to €60,000 | From €60,001 (with upper limits) | From €150,000 up to €10 million |
| Other penalties | Private reprimand | Private or public reprimand | Public reprimand; possible revocation |
| Reaches managers | Exceptionally | Yes | Yes (including disqualification) |
| Legal basis | Arts. 53 and 58 | Arts. 52 and 57 | Arts. 51 and 56 |
Indicative table. The exact amounts and limits follow from Articles 56–59 of Law 10/2010 and from how penalties are graded; how each specific conduct fits must be analyzed case by case.
An inspection is not won by improvising: it is won by keeping your system alive, your documentation organized and giving a measured response to each request. Prior preparation makes the difference between a recommendation and sanctioning proceedings.
SEPBLAC compares the paperwork with actual operations. An up-to-date risk assessment, a manual that is applied, organized files and reporting up to date are the best defense before the request arrives.
Each request is answered on time, with the exact documentation requested and without improvising. Cooperation is mandatory; obstruction makes things worse.
If there are recommendations or requirements to take corrective measures, they are implemented and a record is kept. Diligent remediation counts in your favor in any proceedings.
If you want to prepare for an inspection or already have a request, see our anti-money laundering (AML/CFT) area or our external review / AML audit page.
A SEPBLAC inspection should not be faced blind: you need to prepare, respond to requests, defend yourself if sanctioning proceedings follow and remediate the issues identified. Here is a visual overview of how it works in practice.
1) PrepareThe starting point is not the inspection, but having your system working and documented so that it withstands review.
2) RespondEach request is answered on time and in the proper form, with the exact documentation requested and a solid response.
3) DefendIf proceedings are opened, the defense is built: scope of the infringement, grading, mitigating factors and limitation periods.
4) RemediateSEPBLAC’s recommendations and requirements translate into specific corrective measures, implemented and documented. Diligent remediation counts in the entity’s favor.
Quick decisionPreventive review and mock inspection to detect gaps.
A timely response with the exact documentation requested.
Defense strategy: written submissions, grading and remediation.
Preventive review of the AML/CFT system and detection of gaps before any request.
Diagnostic report and improvement plan.
SEPBLAC requests documents and information, specifying what must be provided and by when.
Acknowledgment of the request and response file.
SEPBLAC assesses the system and can make recommendations or propose requirements to take corrective measures.
Recommendations and, where applicable, requirements.
In the event of significant breaches, sanctioning proceedings may be opened and conducted.
Written submissions, evidence and defense.
Implementation of the corrective measures required and strengthening of the AML/CFT system.
Remediation log with dates and owners.
Spot them before they make the case worse.
If you are facing a SEPBLAC inspection, these terms appear in the requests and in the case file. Understanding them helps you respond with sound judgment and manage the risk of penalties.
Spain’s financial intelligence unit and AML/CFT supervisor, which supervises and inspects compliance with Law 10/2010.
Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Monetary Offenses, the body on which SEPBLAC and sanctioning activity depend.
A SEPBLAC request for documents and information, specifying what must be provided and by when. Responding to it is mandatory.
Document setting out the internal control measures; it is not submitted, but it must be available to SEPBLAC for supervision and inspection.
Report to SEPBLAC of transactions showing indications of money laundering or terrorist financing, alongside systematic reporting.
Independent annual review of the internal control measures, which SEPBLAC usually examines during the inspection.
Law 10/2010 classifies infringements as minor, serious and very serious, each with different penalties.
Measures that SEPBLAC or the Standing Committee can require to correct the deficiencies detected in the inspection.
A penalty that can accompany a fine, with reputational impact; its publication can be delayed in certain cases.
Tell us about your situation with SEPBLAC and we will help you prepare, respond to requests for information and manage the risk of penalties with the right documentation.
SEPBLAC supervises and inspects compliance by obliged entities with their obligations under Article 47 of Law 10/2010 of April 28 on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, implemented by Royal Decree 304/2014. As a support body of the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Monetary Offenses, it also makes recommendations and proposes requirements.
Obliged entities must provide the documentation and information that the Commission or its support bodies, including SEPBLAC, request from them, and the request must specify the documentation to be provided. The AML/CFT manual is not submitted, but it must be kept up to date and available to SEPBLAC for its supervisory and inspection functions.
Chapter VIII of Law 10/2010 (Articles 50–60) regulates infringements (minor, serious and very serious) and the corresponding penalties. For very serious infringements, the fine has a minimum of €150,000 and a maximum equal to the highest of several figures (10% of total annual turnover, twice the economic value of the transaction, five times the profits derived from the infringement, or €10,000,000, following the reform by Royal Decree-law 11/2018), and may be accompanied by a public reprimand and, for authorized entities, revocation. Resisting or obstructing the inspection is a very serious infringement.
Liability can extend to directors and senior managers (Article 54), and the Law regulates how penalties are graded (Article 59) and the limitation periods for infringements and penalties (Article 60), key aspects of the defense in sanctioning proceedings.
The new EU framework (Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 — AMLR — and the AMLA authority) will strengthen AML supervision across the EU, applying from July 10, 2027, so it is advisable to strengthen your system now with that horizon in mind.
Key legislation, linked to the official text:
Legislation and links reviewed in .