A strategy from minute one: facts, narrative and evidence
“We organize the chronology, documents and evidence so that a defense or a prosecution holds together coherently and can be traced.”
Financial crime defense in Spain and strategy (white-collar crime) for companies, executives and investors. We act in investigations, criminal reports and complaints (denuncias/querellas) and criminal proceedings for fraud, misappropriation, disloyal administration, money laundering and corporate offenses. A practical approach: evidence + accounting/financial expert reports + procedural plan to protect your position and, where appropriate, recover assets.
“We organize the chronology, documents and evidence so that a defense or a prosecution holds together coherently and can be traced.”
“We analyze money flows, transactions and documentation: the case is won on financial traces and solid expert evidence.”
“Where there is a loss, we prioritize securing assets: attachments, freezes and preservation of evidence.”
“We prepare appearances and procedural strategy: what to say, what to provide and when, so as not to open up new risks.”
We analyze how the conduct fits the criminal offense: deceit, loss, criminal intent, causation and documentation. We define the strategy for the defense or the prosecution.
Review of the source and flow of funds, money circuits and beneficiaries, backed by documents and accounting/financial expert evidence.
Disputes within governing bodies, corporate records, related-party transactions and decision-making: we build the evidence and the procedural narrative.
Measures to preserve the outcome: freezing, attachment and securing of assets. On the prosecution side, we prioritize recovery and civil liability.
Calculation of the loss, reconstruction of transactions, document traceability and a technical explanation for the investigation and trial.
Full preparation: appearances, filings, proposing evidence, examinations and appeals, with the risk under control.
In financial crime cases, the advantage is built early: preserving evidence, defining a strategy and controlling statements. What matters is not “telling it well” but proving it.
Initial assessment: chronology, documents, risks and strategy (defense or prosecution).
Criminal report/complaint: narrative + evidence + a request for useful investigative steps (and interim measures where appropriate).
Investigation: testimony, court orders, expert evidence and traceability: this is where the case is defined.
Interim measures: attachments, securing of assets and preservation of digital evidence.
Trial and appeals: examinations, expert evidence and final strategy. Appeals where a conviction or an acquittal is open to challenge.
Many financial crime matters overlap with money laundering and the analysis of the source of funds. We work with a focus on traceability and evidence (documentary and expert) and, where applicable, we coordinate the strategy with AML/CFT policies and evidence.
In financial crime cases, the case stands on verifiable facts: documents, money trails and expert evidence. Our work turns scattered information into a defensible evidentiary strategy.
We organize contracts, communications, minutes, bank statements and corporate documents. We build the chronology and the facts with verifiable support.
Reconstruction of transactions, money flows and beneficiaries. Calculation of the loss and a technical explanation for the investigation and trial.
We plan the investigative steps, testimony and procedural moments. Where appropriate, we request interim measures to secure assets and preserve evidence.
In financial crime cases, the strategy changes depending on your procedural position. The key is to align objectives, evidence and timing so you can protect yourself or bring a claim effectively.
| Feature | Defense | Private prosecution |
|---|---|---|
| Objective | Reduce criminal risk: dismantle the offense, intent, causation and evidence. | Strong charges: prove the facts, the loss and participation, and recover assets. |
| Evidentiary approach | Control of statements, challenging the expert evidence and an alternative explanation. | Documents + accounting/financial expert evidence + interim measures to secure the outcome. |
| Risks | Poorly prepared statements, unchallenged evidence, and interim measures. | A weak criminal complaint, lack of expert evidence, or delay in securing assets and evidence. |
| Strategy | Act early: a coherent narrative, exculpatory evidence and procedural timing. | Build from the start: narrative, useful investigative steps, expert evidence and interim measures. |
*Each case depends on the type of offense, the investigating court and the evidence available. The strategy is tailored to the case.
A results-oriented method: strategy, evidence and control of procedural risk. In white-collar crime, evidentiary detail is everything.
We review the facts, documents and procedural position. We define the strategy (defense/prosecution), the risks and the immediate next steps.
We prepare the documents and the financial traceability. We coordinate accounting/financial expert evidence and the preservation of digital evidence.
We manage the investigative steps, statements and filings. We request or oppose interim measures and the securing of assets.
Courtroom strategy: examinations, expert evidence and closing arguments. Appeals and enforcement: civil liability and recovery where appropriate.
In white-collar crime, “explaining” is not enough: you have to prove it. This checklist helps speed up the analysis of the case and strengthen the defense or the prosecution.
Dates, amounts, decisions and actors. A clean timeline avoids contradictions and guides the investigative steps.
Contracts, annexes, minutes, powers of attorney, emails and relevant messages: all organized and in context.
Bank statements, receipts, transfers, wallets if applicable, beneficiaries and the match between payments and obligations.
Clear quantification: what was lost, why and how it is calculated. Expert evidence often decides the case.
Screenshots, exports, backups and chain of custody. Without preservation, the evidence is challenged or lost.
In white-collar crime, mistakes are costly: a badly framed statement or evidence that was not preserved can define the case.
A narrative without documents, traceability or expert evidence. Result: a weak investigation or an exposed defense.
Chats, emails and files not exported in time. Later, authenticity is challenged or the evidence is simply lost.
Without quantifying the loss and reconstructing the finances, it is harder to sustain the offense and civil liability.
Contradictions and loss of control over the narrative. For the defense, this increases risk; for the prosecution, it weakens credibility.
In white-collar crime, the side that proves more wins: facts, intent, loss and traceability of funds.
A case without a clear chronology is a vulnerable case.
In many financial crimes, the real debate is over intent and causation.
What is not quantified gets disputed (or reduced).
Especially relevant where money laundering or investment fraud is suspected.
If you are under investigation or have suffered a loss, act early: preserve evidence, avoid improvised statements and define an evidentiary strategy.
Criminal liability: prison sentences, fines and disqualification depending on the offense and its seriousness.
Civil liability: restitution, compensation and possible confiscation/securing of assets.
Interim measures: attachments, freezes and restrictions that affect operations and assets.
Reputational risk: impact on banks, investors, clients and strategic partners.
Cost of reacting late: correcting course late (without evidence or strategy) usually costs more and leads to a worse outcome.
We design the evidentiary and procedural strategy: evidence preservation, accounting expert evidence, interim measures, and defense or prosecution with the risk under control.
Financial crimes cover criminal conduct linked to economic transactions, investment, business management or movements of funds. They usually require documents, traceability and expert evidence to prove the facts and the intent.
Common examples: fraud, misappropriation, disloyal administration, money laundering and corporate offenses.
The strategy is set by procedural position (defense or prosecution) and by the evidence available.
The difference usually lies in elements such as criminal intent, deceit, misappropriation or disloyal administration, as well as the loss and the evidence.
We analyze whether the conduct fits a criminal offense and, if so, the best route (criminal, civil or commercial).
Don’t improvise. What matters is to prepare your account, documents and evidentiary strategy before appearing.
A badly framed statement can create contradictions or increase procedural risk.
Besides the criminal route, it is usually key to request interim measures (attachment/securing of assets) and to provide expert evidence of the loss to support civil liability.
The sooner you act, the more options there are to locate and secure assets.
Contracts, communications, bank statements, receipts, minutes and corporate documents. Where relevant, preserved digital evidence and a basis for accounting expert evidence.
If the documents are organized, the analysis and the strategy move much faster.
It depends on complexity, volume of documents, the need for expert evidence and the stage of the proceedings. What matters most is the evidentiary and procedural work.
We can give you a quote after reviewing the facts, documents and objectives.
Key legislation, linked to the official text:
Legislation and links reviewed in .