Purchase and sale of real estate
“Taking part in the purchase or sale of real estate on the client’s behalf triggers AML obligations.”
Lawyers are obliged entities for anti-money laundering purposes when they take part in certain transactions. We help you work out when Law 10/2010 applies to you, set up your manual and your due diligence, and handle the delicate boundary of professional secrecy (Art. 22).
Are you an obliged entity? Free assessment
Tell us which transactions your firm handles and we will tell you which AML obligations apply to you.
Six areas of work to comply with anti-money laundering rules as a lawyer, without over-complying or falling short, and while respecting professional secrecy.
We analyze your firm’s transactions to identify which ones trigger Law 10/2010 (purchase and sale of real estate or business entities, fund management, company formation, etc.) and which do not.
We draft the firm’s AML manual, due diligence procedures and internal control measures, tailored to your size and your type of client.
We design how to identify the client and the beneficial owner, and how to apply standard or enhanced measures depending on the risk of each matter.
We help you tell apart the information protected by professional secrecy and the right of defense from the transactions that are subject to reporting.
We define when and how to file suspicious transaction reports with SEPBLAC, covered by the exemption from liability for good-faith reporting.
We audit your AML system, train your firm’s team and prepare you for a possible inspection by the supervisor.
Not everything a lawyer does is subject to anti-money laundering rules. The law lists specific transactions. These are some of the most common.
“Taking part in the purchase or sale of real estate on the client’s behalf triggers AML obligations.”
“Organizing contributions to create, operate or manage companies is one of the covered activities.”
“Managing the client’s funds, securities or other assets, or opening accounts, falls within the scope.”
“Information obtained when assessing the client’s legal position or defending the client falls outside the scope (Art. 22).”
Breaching anti-money laundering obligations can lead to a serious penalty regime. And professional secrecy, although it protects you, does not exempt you from everything.
A lawyer is an obliged entity when involved in the transactions listed in Art. 2.
Infringements are classified as minor, serious and very serious, with significant fines.
No manual or internal control: the lack of procedures (Art. 26) is one of the most common gaps in law firms.
Incomplete due diligence: failing to identify the beneficial owner or to document the risk leaves the file incomplete.
You may not tell the client that a transaction has been reported or is being examined.
Misunderstood secrecy: Art. 22 protects defense and legal advice, not every service covered by the law.
We analyze your transactions, set up your manual and your due diligence, and advise you on the limits of professional secrecy.
Yes, but not always. A lawyer is an obliged entity under Law 10/2010 when involved in certain listed transactions: the purchase and sale of real estate or business entities, the management of funds or assets, the opening of accounts, or the creation and management of companies, among others.
Art. 22 (exemption) provides that lawyers are not subject to certain obligations regarding the information they obtain when ascertaining the client’s legal position or defending the client in proceedings. The duty of professional secrecy remains in place.
No. Secrecy protects the relationship of trust and the right of defense, but it is not absolute. For transactions covered by the law (and not protected by Art. 22), due diligence, internal control and, where there are red flags, reporting all apply.
The main ones are: due diligence (identifying the client and the beneficial owner), manual and internal control (Art. 26), record keeping (Art. 25), reporting suspicious transactions and no disclosure to the client (Art. 24).
Yes. The manual and internal control procedures are one of the core obligations. Their content and requirements vary with the size of the firm and the type of transactions, but documenting the system is essential.
SEPBLAC is the anti-money laundering supervisor. Suspicious transaction reports are filed with SEPBLAC, and it can request information or inspect the firm’s system.
Good-faith reporting to the authorities does not breach any disclosure restrictions and creates no liability for the obliged entity (the law’s exemption from liability).
Yes. Obliged-entity status depends on the transactions, not on size. A small firm involved in covered transactions must comply, although the measures are scaled to its structure.
AML compliance as a lawyer is not red tape for its own sake. It means knowing which transactions bring you within scope, setting up a proportionate system and being clear about where the obligation ends and professional secrecy begins.
Not everything the firm does is covered. The first step is to map which transactions trigger Law 10/2010 and which are protected by professional secrecy.
Manual, due diligence and internal control tailored to the size of the firm and the risk of your clients. Neither over-complying nor falling short.
Identification, risk analysis, decisions and reports must be documented and retained so you can show SEPBLAC that you acted with due diligence.
Want to review your current system? See our AML/CFT audit or the general anti-money laundering framework.
AML compliance in a law firm is a practical exercise. For each engagement you need to check whether it is covered, identify properly, assess the risk and document everything. This panel sets out that workflow.
1) Covered?For each new engagement we determine whether it falls within the Art. 2 transactions or is protected by professional secrecy under Art. 22.
2) Due diligenceWe identify the client and the beneficial owner, assess the risk of the matter and decide whether standard or enhanced measures apply.
3) Red flagsWe analyze the warning signs and, where appropriate, decide to report to SEPBLAC, without disclosing anything to the client.
4) DocumentWe record the identification, the risk analysis and the decisions, and keep the file for the legal retention period.
Quick decisionPurchase and sale, companies, funds: subject to AML.
Information protected by Art. 22: not covered.
Analyze case by case and document the criterion applied.
Yes: a transaction listed in Art. 2.
Full due diligence and a complete file.
Yes: organizing contributions and managing companies.
Identify the beneficial owner and keep the documentation.
Yes: management of funds, securities, assets or accounts.
Risk analysis and monitoring.
No: protected by Art. 22 and professional secrecy.
Keep the secrecy; document the criterion.
No: information obtained to advise the client.
Not covered, unless it is used as a vehicle for money laundering.
Avoiding them is what separates real compliance from mere box-ticking.
If your firm is an obliged entity, these terms come up in the manual, in client files and in your dealings with SEPBLAC. Understanding them helps you comply without surprises.
An individual or legal entity bound by Law 10/2010 when involved in the listed transactions.
Excludes from certain obligations the information obtained when ascertaining the client’s legal position or defending the client.
Formal identification of the client and the beneficial owner, and assessment of the purpose of the relationship.
The natural person who ultimately controls or benefits from the client or the transaction.
The set of policies, manual and procedures the firm must have in place to prevent money laundering.
The service that receives suspicious transaction reports and supervises compliance.
The duty to report to SEPBLAC any transaction showing signs of money laundering or terrorist financing.
The ban on telling the client or third parties that a transaction is being examined or reported.
The regulations implementing Law 10/2010, which set out many of the applicable obligations in detail.
Tell us which transactions your firm handles and we will tell you which AML obligations apply and how to set up a proportionate system.
Lawyers are obliged entities for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing purposes when they take part in certain transactions, under Law 10/2010 and its implementing regulations, Royal Decree 304/2014. What determines coverage is not the type of professional but the specific transaction involved.
The law lists transactions such as the purchase and sale of real estate or business entities, the management of funds, securities or other assets, the opening or management of accounts, and the organization of contributions to create, operate or manage companies. When a lawyer takes part in them on a client’s behalf, AML obligations are triggered.
Article 22 of Law 10/2010 sets out an exemption: lawyers are not subject to certain obligations regarding the information they receive or obtain when ascertaining the client’s legal position or defending the client in proceedings (including advice on instituting or avoiding proceedings), whether before, during or after them. The duty of professional secrecy remains in place. That said, secrecy protects the relationship of trust and the right of defense. It is neither an absolute right nor a free pass to stop applying AML rules to a transaction that is in fact covered.
For covered transactions, the firm must apply due diligence (identifying the client and the beneficial owner), put in place a manual and internal control measures (Art. 26), keep records (Art. 25), report suspicious transactions to SEPBLAC and respect the ban on disclosure to the client (Art. 24). Good-faith reporting is covered by an exemption from liability.
The anti-money laundering supervisor is SEPBLAC. Non-compliance can lead to a penalty regime that classifies infringements as minor, serious and very serious. A proportionate, well-documented AML system is the firm’s best defense in a possible inspection.
Key legislation, linked to the official text:
Legislation and links reviewed in .