Payment institutions
All funds received from users (or through another PSP) to execute payment transactions must be safeguarded while you hold them. This includes money remitters, even when the funds are in transit.
The core obligation of every payment institution and EMI: we design your safeguarding system under Article 21 of Royal Decree-law 19/2018 — method, designated accounts, reconciliations and evidence — so that it withstands review by the Bank of Spain.
Assessment of your safeguarding
Within 24 h, we tell you whether your funds flow and your safeguarding method meet what the supervisor requires.
Quick answer
Safeguarding of funds is the obligation of payment institutions and electronic money institutions to protect their clients’ money against a possible insolvency (Article 21 of Royal Decree-law 19/2018). There are two methods: segregating the funds — and, if the institution still holds them at the end of the following business day, depositing them in a separate account at a credit institution or investing them in safe, liquid assets — or covering them with an insurance policy or comparable guarantee from an entity outside the group. The Bank of Spain reviews it at authorization and throughout the life of the institution.
Safeguarding is not an annex to your application: it is a condition for getting authorized and for banks to work with you. It applies to every type of institution that receives funds from users.
All funds received from users (or through another PSP) to execute payment transactions must be safeguarded while you hold them. This includes money remitters, even when the funds are in transit.
Funds received in exchange for electronic money issued are safeguarded from the moment they are received (Law 21/2011). Wallets and prepaid cards depend on this obligation.
The simplified regime reduces capital and other requirements, but not safeguarding: client money is protected in exactly the same way.
If you also carry on another activity (as a hybrid payment institution), the accounting and operational separation of payment funds is even more critical — and it is the first thing the supervisor looks at.
The rules let you choose a method — or combine them. Your choice shapes your bank agreements, your day-to-day operations and your recurring costs.
| Feature | Method 1 · Segregation and deposit | Method 2 · Insurance or guarantee |
|---|---|---|
| What it involves | Never commingle users’ funds with any other funds and, if you still hold them at the end of the following business day after receipt, deposit them in a separate account at a credit institution or invest them in safe, liquid, low-risk assets. | Cover the amount of the funds with an insurance policy or comparable guarantee from an insurer or credit institution outside your group, payable in the event of insolvency. |
| Insolvency protection | The funds stay outside the insolvency estate: they are protected from the institution’s other creditors. | The insurance or guarantee pays out the equivalent amount if the institution cannot meet its obligations. |
| Day-to-day operations | A designated safeguarding account, frequent reconciliations, control of the “following business day” deadline and traceability of every flow. | Ongoing calculation of the amount covered and adjustment of the cover to the actual volume of funds. |
| Practical difficulty | Getting a bank to open your safeguarding account: this is the real bottleneck in many applications. | Finding a willing insurer and bearing the recurring cost of the premium; less common in Spain. |
| When it makes sense | The standard model: the general practice in the Spanish market and the one the supervisor knows best. | Highly variable volumes or temporary difficulty accessing banking services; also as a reinforcement of method 1. |
Under Article 21 of Royal Decree-law 19/2018 and its implementing rules in Royal Decree 736/2019. For electronic money, Law 21/2011 refers to these same safeguarding requirements.
The Bank of Spain is not satisfied with the document alone: it asks for evidence that the process works every day. These are the points it will audit.
A separate account at a credit institution, identified as such, with no own funds mixed in and no uses unrelated to payments.
A control ensuring that no client funds remain unsafeguarded beyond the Article 21 deadline.
Frequent (ideally daily) matching of client balances, the safeguarding account and internal records, with the evidence kept on file.
A documented map of the funds flow: where the funds come in, where they are deposited, when they go out and who controls them.
If you invest instead of depositing: only safe, liquid, low-risk assets, with an approved policy and defined limits.
A procedure for mismatches, delays and unavailability of the safeguarding bank, with escalation and logging.
For hybrid institutions and groups, accounting that ring-fences payment funds from any other line of business.
Periodic reporting to the Bank of Spain and review of safeguarding in the institution’s annual audit.
The application is drafted without a signed bank agreement. This is the No. 1 cause of applications stalling: without a designated account, there is no safeguarding that counts.
They are different obligations: capital backs your solvency; safeguarding protects the client’s money. Mixing them up in the application undermines its credibility.
Without frequent, documented reconciliation, any mismatch surfaces late — and in front of the supervisor, an undetected mismatch is a serious finding.
The obligation does not end with the license: growing in volume, adding services or changing banks requires recalibrating the system and notifying the change.
2026 context: the PSD3/PSR proposal — still in the legislative process — would strengthen safeguarding (diversification of custodian banks, more information for clients). Designing to that standard today saves you tomorrow’s adaptation.
It is the legal obligation of payment institutions and electronic money institutions to protect their clients’ funds against a possible insolvency of the institution, by keeping them segregated and deposited at a credit institution, invested in safe assets or covered by insurance or a guarantee (Art. 21 Royal Decree-law 19/2018).
A separate, designated account at a credit institution where users’ funds are deposited. It cannot be mixed with the institution’s own funds, and the balances are protected from the institution’s other creditors in the event of insolvency proceedings.
If at the end of the following business day after receipt you still hold the funds and they have not been delivered to the payee or transferred to another provider, they must already be in the separate account or invested in safe, liquid, low-risk assets.
Yes: the second method lets you cover the funds with an insurance policy or comparable guarantee from an insurer or credit institution outside your group, for an amount equivalent to what would otherwise be segregated. It is a minority option in Spanish practice, but it is useful as an alternative or as a reinforcement.
Yes. Although in money remittance the funds are in transit and no payment account is opened, they must be protected with the same methods while the institution holds them. A remitter’s funds flow is designed precisely around that time window.
It is one of the obligations whose breach is considered most serious: it can lead to immediate supervisory measures, penalties and, in extreme cases, revocation of the authorization — as well as reputational damage with your banks and partners.
The PSD3/PSR proposal (still in the legislative process as of July 2026) keeps safeguarding as a central element and would strengthen it: more detail on designated accounts, diversification of custodian institutions and information for clients. It does not apply yet, but it is wise to design your system with that horizon in mind.
Tell us about your project and we will explain how to design (or fix) your institution’s safeguarding of funds so that it can be defended before the Bank of Spain.
The obligation to safeguard funds received from payment service users: methods, deadlines and insolvency protection.
View on the BOE BOE — Spanish Official State GazetteImplementing regulation for payment services: requirements for separate accounts and the regime applicable to institutions.
View on the BOE Bank of SpainOfficial register of authorized payment institutions and electronic money institutions, which are supervised on safeguarding.
View the registerSafeguarding of funds is the mechanism lawmakers use to protect the money of payment service users: whatever happens to the institution, its clients’ funds are not used to pay its debts. That is why the Bank of Spain scrutinizes it closely in the authorization of a payment institution or of an EMI (an EDE, in Spanish terms), and supervises it throughout the life of the institution.
A well-drafted safeguarding policy is not enough: the supervisor asks for signed bank agreements, operational designated accounts, documented reconciliations and a traceable funds flow. The greatest practical difficulty is usually opening the safeguarding account — banks apply their own risk appetite — which is why it should be worked on from the initial scoping stage, not at the end of the application.
We design the safeguarding method suited to your model, draft the policy and the reconciliation procedure, support you in negotiations with the custodian institutions and defend the system in response to the supervisor’s requests for information — both during authorization and in your ongoing compliance afterwards.